Category: Nursing

Objective

• Identify appropriate expected outcomes for your project.
• Identify the strategies to implement your project.

Deliverables

• Write a 3-4 page (not including the title and reference pages).
• APA formatted paper with an introduction and conclusion.
• APA headings for each section of the paper.
• At least 5 peer-reviewed references.

Step 1: Capstone Project

• Write a paper identifying the Expected Outcomes, Approach, and Budget for your capstone.

Step 2: Consider

• Expected Outcomes at least 5
• What specific questions will your project address?
• How are these questions related to one another?
• Approach
• What will you actually do to address the actionable questions?
• What will you do to create improved outcomes?
• Budget

Step 3: Write

• Write a paper that addresses the criteria above.
• Use the template attached below.

Step 4 Save and Submit

• When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place and submit a copy to your instructor using Dropbox.
• Use the template linked below to complete this assignment.

Purpose:

To propose an organisational change in the healthcare environment using appropriate strategies, theories and models.

Process:

In any well-run organisation most changes go through a process of authorization because of the potential impact on and cost to the organisation. This generally begins with a change proposal pitch. Pitches are not a simple presentation of a possible change. Rather they are well-considered proposals for a change that will have benefits for the organisation. By making a preliminary pitch you will receive invaluable feedback to help you develop a higher quality change proposal.

This assessment consists of 2 parts:

1. Individual: You will develop a 5-minute pitch that briefly describes the change you want to develop. The pitch is a concise and compelling summary of your change along with how you are proposing to implement it. The pitch should be a video with up to one slide if you wish.

Words 650

Key points to keep in mind:

1. Preliminary research into the change you are considering is necessary
2. Inclusion of relevant data and research is required

The purpose of this assessment is to enhance your understanding of the unique healthcare needs of special population groups and to develop your skills in providing culturally competent nursing care. You will research and present on a specific special population group, exploring their cultural values, healthcare disparities, and strategies for providing culturally sensitive care. Choose one of the following special population groups for your presentation: LGBTQ+. Homeless or housing insecure individuals. Incarcerated individuals. Disabled veterans. Racial and/or cultural minorities. To complete your presentation, do the following: Include the following elements in your PowerPoint presentation: Introduction to the special population group. Cultural values and beliefs relevant to healthcare. Healthcare disparities faced by the special population group. Strategies for providing culturally competent nursing care. Case studies or personal narratives that illustrate the application of culturally competent care. Resources for further learning. Provide an APA formatted reference slide(s) at the end of your PowerPoint. Create the script of what you will be saying in the speakers notes of your PowerPoint. Use Kaltura to record your voice giving the presentation. Consult Using Kaltura if you need additional information on how to record your presentation. Your presentation should be approximately 5 to 10 minutes in length. Your presentation will be graded using the following criteria: Accuracy and depth of content: Explain the characteristics of a chosen special population group and their healthcare needs. Make sure you cover relevant cultural values, beliefs, special considerations, and healthcare disparities. Support your explanation with evidence from professional or other expert sources. Application of culturally competent care strategies: Present concrete examples and practical strategies for providing culturally sensitive nursing care to you chosen special population. Support this part of your presentation with evidence or personal experiences. Make sure you are making explicit connections between the strategies and the cultural values or health disparities they are trying to address. Culturally sensitive approach: Present information in a respectful and unbiased manner, recognizing the diversity within the special population group. Make sure that you focus on unbiased and respectful language. Ask yourself, how am I demonstrating that there is diversity within the special population group? Ask yourself, how am I demonstrating the value for equitable and inclusive care for this group? Effective communication and speaker’s notes: Presents information clearly and concisely, using appropriate visual aids and language. Speaker notes are clear and written in complete sentences. Remember, your speaker’s notes should reflect what you are saying when you record your presentation. Overall organization, adherence to presentation requirements, and APA style: Presentation is well-organized, adheres to the specified length, and follows APA style for in-text citations and reference list. Remember, your presentation, once recorded should be at least 5 minutes, but no more than 10 minutes. Make sure you remember to use APA style in-text citations where relevant and include an APA style reference slide at the end of your PowerPoint. Submission Requirements Length of Recorded Presentation: Your presentation must be at least 5 minutes, but not longer than 10 minutes. Number of Slides: 6 to 12 slides are the approximate number of slides that should help you cover the material in sufficient depth for your presentation, while also remaining within the time limit range. APA Style and Formatting: In-text citations and reference list should be in current APA style. Use any APA approved font for your PowerPoint Slides. Number of references: A minimum of 5 scholarly or professional best-practice sources from the last five years. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: Competency 3: Educate individuals on prevention and management of health conditions, across the life span and including special populations, based on pathophysiology, pharmacology, and physical assessment knowledge. Explain the characteristics of a chosen special population group and their healthcare needs. Present concrete examples and practical strategies for providing culturally sensitive nursing care. to a chosen special population. Present information in a respectful and unbiased manner, recognizing the diversity within the special population group. Competency 5: Apply scholarly writing standards to communicate evidence based strategies that support safe and effective patient care. Present information clearly and concisely, using appropriate visual aids and language. Speaker notes are provided. Presentation is well-organized, adheres to the specified length, and follows APA style for in-text citations and reference list. I chose Incarcerated individuals. Criterion 1 Explain the characteristics of a chosen special population group and their healthcare needs. Distinguished Explains the characteristics of a chosen special population group and their healthcare needs. Uses evidence to support the explanation as it pertains to special characteristics and healthcare disparities. Proficient Explains the characteristics of a chosen special population group and their healthcare needs. Basic Identifies the characteristics of a chosen special population group and their healthcare needs. However, lacks the depth or clarity of a full explanation. Non Performance Does not identify the characteristics of a chosen special population group and their healthcare needs. Criterion 2 Present concrete examples and practical strategies for providing culturally sensitive nursing care. to a chosen special population. Distinguished Presents concrete examples and practical strategies for providing culturally sensitive nursing care. to a chosen special population. Makes explicit connections between examples and strategies with the cultural values or health disparities trying to be addressed. Proficient Presents concrete examples and practical strategies for providing culturally sensitive nursing care to a chosen special population. Basic Describes some general examples or strategies for providing culturally sensitive nursing care, but they are not within the context of a chosen special population. Non Performance Does not describe general examples or strategies for providing culturally sensitive nursing care, Criterion 3 Present information in a respectful and unbiased manner, recognizing the diversity within the special population group. Distinguished Presents information in a respectful and unbiased manner, recognizing the diversity within the special population group. Uses specific examples to demonstrate the value of equitable and inclusive care for the chosen population group. Proficient Presents information in a respectful and unbiased manner, recognizing the diversity within the special population group. Basic Information is presented professionally. However, the information either fails to recognize the diversity within the special population group or occasionally uses language that is unintentionally biased. Non Performance Does not present information professionally or respectfully. Alternatively information is presented in a biased way that seems intentional. Criterion 4 Present information clearly and concisely, using appropriate visual aids and language. Speaker notes are provided. Distinguished Presents information clearly and concisely, using appropriate visual aids and language. Speaker notes are clear, written in complete sentences, and reflect what is said in the recorded presentation. Proficient Presents information clearly and concisely, using appropriate visual aids and language. Speaker notes are clear and written in complete sentences. Basic Presents the information, but the clarity is lacking, the use of visual aids is not relevant or confusing. The Speaker notes are incomplete and do not reflect what is being said in the recorded presentation. Non Performance Information is poorly organized and difficult to follow. The visual aids and language are not aligned to the topic or field. Speaker notes are not included. Criterion 5 Presentation is well-organized, adheres to the specified length, and follows APA style for in-text citations and reference list. Distinguished Presentation is well-organized, adheres to the specified length, and follows APA style for in-text citations and reference list. There are no errors in APA style. Proficient Presentation is well-organized, adheres to the specified length, and follows APA style for in-text citations and reference list. There may be minimal errors in APA style. Basic Presentation is either poorly organized, one-minute under or over the specified length, or APA style has many errors. Non Performance Does not present the information at all. Or, presentation more than one-minute under or over the specific length. Or, makes no apparent attempt at utilizing APA style.

Objectives

• Identify electronic database search strategies (e.g., CINAHL, PubMed)
• Locating and evaluating sources of evidence

Deliverables

• Write a 3-5 page (not including the title and reference pages) paper
• APA 7 formatted paper with an introduction and conclusion.
• APA 7 headings for each section of the paper
• At least 3 peer-reviewed articles

Step 1: Research

• Interview a librarian or nursing scholar on methods for locating and appraising health and other relevant research literature and electronic database search on strategies.
• Do not use your Capstone Project topic from BSN 355 in this course. Choose a new topic. Research out to your instructor for help if needed.

Step 2: Consider

• Write a quality appraisal of the Library and resources.
• What did you learn?
• How do you locate and evaluate sources of evidence?
• Which electronic database would you use most and what types of search words would you use?
• What are the strengths?
• What are the weaknesses?
• Is it adequate? Why or why not?

Step 3: Write

• Write a paper that addresses the questions above.

The topic is home health nurses have noticed is poor medication compliance among patients after discharging from acute care settings. all articles should be from the last 5 years, here are some I found, please add 1 -2 more.

1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2021). THE ESSENTIALS: CORE COMPETENCIES FOR PROFESSIONAL NURSING EDUCATION. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Publications/Essentials-2021.pdf
2. Dijkstra, N. E., Vervloet, M., Sino, C. G. M., Heerdink, E. R., Nelissen-Vrancken, M., Bleijenberg, N., de Bruin, M., & Schoonhoven, L. (2021). Home Care Patients’ Experiences with Home Care Nurses’ Support in Medication Adherence. Patient preference and adherence, 15, 19291940.
3. Gualtieri, L., Steinfeldt, M., Shaveet, E., Estime, B., & Singhal, M. (2024). The Impact of Home Medication Management Practices on Medication Adherence. Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 14(9), 804.
4. Smith, L., Brown, P., & Nguyen, H. (2021). Strategies to improve medication adherence in home health patients. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 38(3), 145152. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370016.2021.1901234
5. Walden University Library. (2022). Evaluating sources using the CRAAP test. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/craap-test

here is the rubric:

15 pts

Exemplary

Identifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides direction for the content that is engaging and thought provoking. The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the presentation. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Compares/contrasts perspectives, considers counter arguments or opposing positions, and draws original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications.

10 pts

Accomplished

Identifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides adequate direction for the content with some degree of interest for the reader. The thesis states the position, premise, or hypothesis, and is the focal point of the paper for the most part. Demonstrates an understanding and some critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Adequately compares/contrasts perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions but broader connections and/or implications are not as thoroughly explored

5 pts

Developing

Identifies a research topic but may be too broad in scope and/or the thesis is somewhat unclear and needs to be developed further. Focal point is not consistently maintained throughout the paper. Demonstrates general understanding with limited critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Summarizes perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory – Beginning

Fails to identify a relevant research topic or is not clearly defined and/or the paper lacks focus throughout. Demonstrates a lack of understanding and inadequate analysis of the research topic and thesis. Analysis is superficial based on opinions and preferences rather than critical analysis.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Decision Making and Clinical Reasoning

15 pts

Exemplary

Provides compelling and accurate evidence to support in-depth analysis to the central position beyond the required (2) research sources with at least 1 source from a periodical database. Research sources are highly relevant, accurate, recent (less than 5 years old) and reliable and add to the strength of the content.

10 pts

Accomplished

Provides essential, accurate evidence to support the central position with the required (2) research sources including 1 source from a periodical database that are mostly relevant, accurate, recent (less than 5 years old) and reliable.

5 pts

Developing

Provides some evidence to support the central position with less than 2 acceptable research sources. Some sources may not be relevant, accurate, and reliable, greater than 5 years old and may not be from scholarly sources.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory – Beginning

Lacks sufficient research sources to support the central position and/or, if included, are generally not relevant, accurate, or reliable. Contains numerous factual mistakes, omissions, or oversimplifications.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Organization & Presentation

15 pts

Exemplary

Content is effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flows smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc.). For a slide presentation, the design, font size, style, and spacing are optimal for audience viewing

10 pts

Accomplished

Content is adequately organized. Ideas are arranged reasonably with a progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes required components of an introduction, body, and conclusion. For a slide presentation, one or more components of the design, font size, style, and spacing may be less than ideal for audience viewing.

5 pts

Developing

Content is somewhat organized. For a paper, occasionally ideas from paragraph to paragraph may not flow well and/or connect to the central position or be clear as a whole. May be missing a required component and/or components may be less than complete. For a slide presentation, multiple aspects of the design require further development for optimal audience viewing.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory – Beginning

Content lacks logical organization and impedes readers comprehension of ideas. For a paper, central position is rarely evident from paragraph to paragraph and/or the paper is missing multiple required components. For a slide presentation, the design lacks clarity for optimal viewing by an audience.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Writing and APA Formatting

15 pts

Exemplary

Content is well written and uses standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Basically, free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors. APA guidelines for formatting are consistently followed. Includes in-text citations and references that are written correctly.

10 pts

Accomplished

Content shows above average writing style and clarity in writing using standard English. Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and/or formatting. APA guidelines for formatting are present. In-text citations are present but may not be complete or correctly formatted. References are written using correct APA format

5 pts

Developing

Content shows an average and/or casual writing style using standard English. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. Use of APA guidelines are generally present, however are incorrectly formatted.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory – Beginning

Content shows a below average/poor writing style lacking in elements of appropriate standard English. Frequent errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. Lacks elements required in writing a formal APA paper: title page, references, in-text citations, headers.

15 pts

Total Points: 60

PICOT QUESTION In adult emergent patients requiring critical resuscitation, does intraosseous access, compared with intravenous access, improve medication delivery efficiency and increase rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during the resuscitation event?

Instructions:

Select a research article related to nursing and write a 2-3 double spaced page (NOT including the title page and references) article evaluation. Use only scholarly/professional, peer-reviewed articles written within the last 5 years You must choose your article by the end of week 2 and show it to your instructor for approval Use only scholarly/professional, peer-reviewed references. Do not use Wikipedia or internet sources that are not officially recognized as authority websites, as such websites are not scholarly sources. Also, keep in mind that not every .org domain is an authoritative website. 2-3 double spaced page (NOT including the title page and references) In your evaluation, address each of the following components: The author(s), their credentials, and practice areas Statement of problem or issue The purpose of the study Gap in the literature identified Research question(s) Review of the literature Population, sample size, and sample selection process Study design Research method(s) used in the study Research findings Limitations Article critique. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the study. Discussion of how the information in the article might be useful in future nursing practice Written in APA format (6th edition). This paper should include: Formal components including title page APA headers (include page numbers) APA formatted headings in the body of the paper Appropriate in-text reference citations A reference page, in correct APA format All assignments are expected to be submitted by the due dates. Refer to written assignments guidelines in the syllabus. Late assignments without faculty consultation and consent may result in a penalty of (5) points per college day past due on any written assignment. Failure to submit a written assignment and/or consistent lateness can result in a grade of 0 or F.

RUBRIC

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 1. Author(s), their credentials, and practice areasthreshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent. The author(s), their credentials, and practice areas are clearly and thoroughly identified Statement of the problem or issue and purpose of the study CSLO: 2 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

The statement of the problem or issue and purpose of the study contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information No sources older then 2020 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome 3. Research question(s) CSLO: 2 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent

, The research question(s) are clearly and thoroughly identified. Review of the literature and gap in the literature identified. CSLO: 2 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

The review of the literature contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information. Thoroughly addresses presence or absence of gap in the literature. Population, sample size, and sample selection process CSLO: 2 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

The population, sample size, and sample selection process contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information Research method(s) and study design CSLO: 2 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

The research method(s) and study design contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information. . Research findings, limitations, and suggestions for future research CSLO: 5 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

The research findings, limitations, and suggestions for future research contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information. Article Critique. Discuss strengths and weaknesses of the study. CSLO 3 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Exceeds MasteryExcellent.

The article critique contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information. Discussion of how the information in the article might be Discussion of how the information in the article might be useful in future nursing practice.uture nursing practice. CSLO 1, 5 threshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

The discussion of how the information in the article might be useful in future nursing practice contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of information APAthreshold: 10.0 pts 10 pts Excellent.

Skillful and proficient writing using appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation and mechanics, and APA style and formatting of the title page, headers, page numbers, headings in the body of the paper, appropriate in-text reference citations, and reference page. Written in 2-3 double spaced pages.

• Reply to the following posts separately
• Length: A minimum of 150 words per post, not including references.
• Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA per post from within the last 5 years.
• Separate reference page for each reply

1) Alternative methods to preventive care or complementary and alternative methods (CAM) are methods that utilize a holistic approach and/or lifestyle-based methods to prevent diseases, and to maintain mental and physical wellness. Methods such as taking herbal supplements, dietary changes, and yoga have proven to have a significant impact on the overall health of patients. Herbal supplements such as ashwagandha have been used to manage stress, anxiety and fatigue (Hassen et al., 2022). The use of herbal supplements has been on the rise because they are do not require a prescription from a physician or advance practice nurse and generally safe when taken in moderation. It is important to note that herbal supplements are not regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and patients should consult their primary care provider before taking. Dietary changes have also shown to be beneficial to preventing or slowing the progression of diseases.

2) Recent systematic reviews have found that pet therapy, which is a structured patient-animal interaction between patients and specially trained animals, can help alleviate psychological stress, anxiety, and depression in a number of patient groups, including those who are hospitalized and have chronic illnesses. However, the effectiveness of pet therapy depends on the parameters of the therapy and the population of interest (Sim et al., 2025; Chang et al., 2024). I am excited to discuss my personal experience with you. I had a homeless patient who was dependent on his dog for emotional support. He became increasingly agitated during his hospital stay and asked to leave the hospital against medical advice (AMA) because he missed his dog at the shelter. I realized that the emotional bond and its significance to his care were important, so I offered him pet therapy services that were available at our hospital. He agreed. After the interaction with the therapy dog, he seemed happier, more relaxed, and more willing to participate in his treatment plan.

• Research paper for English with ANA topic 1400 words apa style 7th edition with 6 credible references I need help with things she said need improvement TOPIC 3: Nursing Advocacy for LGBTQ+ Populations
• Full ANA Position Statement: American Nurses Association. (2022). Nursing advocacy for LGBTQ+ populations.
• Problem: Many LGBTQ+ individuals have reported experiencing some form of discrimination or bias when accessing health care services. Persistent societal stigma, ongoing discrimination, and denial of civil and human rights impede individuals self-determination and access to needed health care services, leading to negative health outcomes including increased morbidity and mortality (American Nurses Association [ANA], 2022, para. 3). There is a need for equality in hospital/facility policies that apply to visiting privileges, decision making, and access to partners. There is a need for further research and education regarding best practices and public policy to support the care and overall wellbeing of the LGBTQ+ community (ANA, 2022).