Category: Nursing

Generate a Visual Study Guide to capture the essential information and clinical pearls on the topics in the videos you watched.

In order to write a case study paper, you must carefully address a number of sections in a specific order with specific information contained in each. The guideline below outlines each of those sections.

Section

Information to Include

Introduction (patient and problem)

• Explain who the patient is (Age, gender, etc.)
• Explain what the problem is (What was he/she diagnosed with, or what happened?)
• Introduce your main argument (What should you as a nurse focus on or do?)

Pathogenesis

• Explain the development or evolution of the disease, from the initial stimulus (how etiologic factors alter physiologic function) to ultimate expression of manifestations of the disease and related complications.
• History
• Explain what health problems the patient has (Has she/he been diagnosed with other diseases?)
• Detail any and all previous treatments (Has she/he had any prior surgeries or is he/she on medication?)

Nursing Physical Assessment

• List all the patients health stats in sentences with specific numbers/levels (Blood pressure, bowel sounds, ambulation, etc.)

Related Treatments

• Explain what treatments the patient is receiving because of his/her disease

Nursing Diagnosis & Patient Goal

• Explain what your nursing diagnosis is (What is the main problem for this patient? What need to be addressed?)
• Explain what your goal is for helping the patient recover (What do you want to change for the patient?)

Nursing Interventions

• Explain how you will accomplish your nursing goals, and support this with citations (Reference the literature)

Evaluation

• Explain how effective the nursing intervention was (What happened after your nursing intervention? Did the patient get better?)

Recommendations

• Explain what the patient or nurse should do in the future to continue recovery/improvement

Your paper should be 10-12 pages in length and will be graded on how well you complete each of the above sections. You will also be graded on your use of APA style and on your application of nursing journals into the treatments and interventions. For integrating nursing journals, remember the following:

• Make sure to integrate citations into all of your paper
• Support all claims of what the disease is, why it occurs, and how to treat it with references to the literature on this disease
• Always use citations for information that you learned from a book or article; if you do not cite it, you are telling your reader that YOU discovered that information (how to treat the disease, etc.)

Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.

PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO THE FOLLOWING RUBIC

General Education Standardized Rubric: PATH 370 Signature Assignment

General Education Standardized Rubric: PATH 370 Signature Assignment

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Introduction

3.5 to >3.12 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Introduction summarizes the case comprehensively and prepares the reader for the remainder of the paper.

3.12 to >2.52 pts

Meets Expectations

Introduction summarizes the case and somewhat prepares the reader for the remainder of the paper.

2.52 to >2.07 pts

Approaches Expectations

Introduction lacks detail to prepare the reader for the case.

2.07 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Introduction is not present or is grossly erroneous.

3.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Pathophysiology

8.1 to >7.21 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Identifies and thoroughly explains the pathogenesis of the disease topic. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, supported and sufficient.

7.21 to >5.83 pts

Meets Expectations

Mostly Identifies and thoroughly explains the pathogenesis of the disease topic. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.

5.83 to >4.78 pts

Approaches Expectations

Provides insufficient explanations. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary or supported with evidence and a sound rationale.

4.78 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not answer or answers incorrectly with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.

8.1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

History, Physical and Related Treatments

8.4 to >7.48 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Provides a detailed patient history, physical assessment findings, treatment, and related treatments for the disease topic. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, supported and sufficient.

7.48 to >6.05 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides most patient history, physical assessment findings, treatment, and related treatments for the disease topic. but may be limited. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.

6.05 to >4.96 pts

Approaches Expectations

Provides insufficient explanations. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary or supported with evidence and a sound rationale.

4.96 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not answer or answers incorrectly with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.

8.4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Nursing Diagnosis and Patient Goals

8.1 to >7.21 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Provides thorough and detailed nursing diagnosis and patient goal. Information is scientifically sound, supported and sufficient.

7.21 to >5.83 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides mostly detailed nursing diagnosis and patient goal. Information is mostly scientifically sound, support and sufficient.

5.83 to >4.78 pts

Approaches Expectations

Provides insufficient explanations. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. Does not address the context sufficiently or with sound rationale.

4.78 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not answer or incorrectly explains content.Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient

8.1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Nursing Interventions

8.1 to >7.21 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Thoroughly details the nursing interventions. Detailed explanation of nursing goals.Rationale is thorough, supported and sufficient.

7.21 to >5.83 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides some details of the nursing interventions. Detailed explanation of nursing goals.Rationale is supported and mostly sufficient.

5.83 to >4.78 pts

Approaches Expectations

Provides insufficient explanations. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. Does not address the context sufficiently or with sound rationale.

4.78 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not answer or answers incorrectly with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.

8.1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Evaluation

8.1 to >7.21 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Provides thorough and insightful explanation of the effectiveness of the nursing intervention. Information is scientifically sound, supported andsufficient in detail

7.21 to >5.83 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides most thorough and insightful explanation of the effectiveness of the nursing intervention. Information is mostly scientifically sound, supported but may lack detail in some areas.

5.83 to >4.78 pts

Approaches Expectations

Provides insufficient explanations of the effectiveness of the nursing interventions. Does not address the context sufficiently or with sound rationale.

4.78 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not answer or answers incorrectly with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.

8.1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Recommendations

8.1 to >7.21 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Provides an overall thorough explanation of patient recommendations.Clinical findings are supported with evidence, compared and rationalized thoroughly. Recommendations for continued recovery/improvement explained and supported.

7.21 to >5.83 pts

Meets Expectations

Provides an overall thorough explanation of patient recommendations.Some clinical findings are supported with evidence, compared and rationalized thoroughly. Recommendations for continued recovery/improvement explained and supported.

5.83 to >4.78 pts

Approaches Expectations

Provides insufficient explanations. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. Does not address the context sufficiently or with sound rationale

4.78 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not answer or answers incorrectly with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.

8.1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

APA format and References

7 to >6.23 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Meets all the requirements related to length. There is a minimum of 3 scholarly resources with at least 1 non-internet source. All references are correctly cited in APA format. The student shows a solid grasp of APA formatting, paraphrasing and citations.

6.23 to >5.04 pts

Meets Expectations

Meets most of the requirements related to length. There is a minimum of 3 resources with at least 1 non-internet source; the references may be questionable or not scholarly in nature. Most references are correctly cited in APA format. The student shows a good grasp of APA formatting, paraphrasing and citations but needs refinement in some areas.

5.04 to >4.13 pts

Approaches Expectations

Meets some of the requirements related to length but is lacking enough to impede the meaning of the paper. The references do not meet required count and/or may be questionable or not scholarly in nature. References are not correctly cited in APA format. The student does not show a good grasp of APA formatting, paraphrasing and citations.

4.13 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not follow format, length and layout requirements. References are not present or do not support scholarly intention. A lack of effort it apparent. There are extensive errors in formatting.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Mechanics

5.6 to >4.98 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated.The writing is free of spelling and grammatical errors.

4.98 to >4.03 pts

Meets Expectations

Answers are well written throughout and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. It is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.

4.03 to >3.3 pts

Approaches Expectations

Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors

3.3 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Answers are not well written and the information is poorly organized and lacks clarity. It contains many spelling and grammatical errors

5.6 pts

in this paper, the goal is to apply ethical concepts previously learned to a specific ethical dilemma. Or, you may choose to do write an Opt-Ed paper.

First, you might want to google the word “monologue” for clear definition and description of the word.

Before completing this assignment, please read the following articles and website:

Below are suggested topics for your ethical issues paper:

• Artificial Intelligence in nursing
• Ethical issues in research
• Genetics in Nursing
• Horizontal fashion incivility and vertical incivility
• Incivility in the profession – Example: Expert RN towards Novice Nurses
• Informatics in Nursing
• Resources for Impaired Nurses
• Robotics
• Scholarship in Nursing by Boyer
• The new competencies for BSN degree nurses
• Violence – Example: bullying

The paper should be organized and systematic in manner. The content should:

• be your original work
• flow and be easy to read
• be no more than 5 pages (including the cover page and the reference page)
• adhere to
• (includes introduction, body, conclusion) with correct grammar and spelling are expected

This is a group assignment and I will be working on 4 Slides about The Nazi Experiment of WWII. Rhis needs to be in a 5×5 or 6×6 format. Citations are only needed on powerpoint slides. This is Specifically about the Acts and Reports section only.

Instructions

Based on the research question and specific aims drafted in the “Module 3 PICOT Question, Hypothesis, and Aims” assignment, identify 10-15 research publications that help provide the context to what is known and lacking about your topic.

• Sources should be peer-reviewed and published within the last 5 years unless seen as gold standard/historical publications.
• Use search engines such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and the YC library to conduct your search.
• Be sure to synthesize all articles for relevance, key findings, related measurements, methodology, and quality.
• As a general rule, you will need to provide support (i.e., citation) for anything that is not general knowledge.

Format

• Use the prior Research Proposal document you created in the “Module 3 PICOT Question, Hypothesis, and Aims” assignment. Be sure to include all prior submitted sections with necessary edits.
• Write 5 6 paragraphs:
• Paragraph 1 Outline the problem as it relates to your PICOT question.
• Paragraphs 2-3 Present the available knowledge in a fluid fashion.
• Paragraphs 4-5 Examine limitations and gaps in existing publications.
• Paragraph 6 Articulate how your research question is positioned to fill in the gaps and the importance of conducting said research.

Note: the above outline is a general recommendation, not a requirement. However, this section will be approximately 2-3 pages double-spaced once completed.

• Include in-text citations throughout
• Use clear, academic language with a scientific tone.
• Avoid the use of first-person language.

Within research, direct quotations are not typically seen. Therefore, you are expected to synthesize the articles, paraphrase the information as it relates to your proposal and cite according to APA format.

Objectives

• Identify electronic database search strategies (e.g., CINAHL, PubMed)
• Locating and evaluating sources of evidence

Deliverables

• Write a 3-5 page (not including the title and reference pages) paper
• APA 7 formatted paper with an introduction and conclusion.
• APA 7 headings for each section of the paper
• At least 3 peer-reviewed articles

Step 1: Research

• Interview a librarian or nursing scholar on methods for locating and appraising health and other relevant research literature and electronic database search on strategies.
• Do not use your Capstone Project topic from BSN 355 in this course. Choose a new topic. Research out to your instructor for help if needed.

Step 2: Consider

• Write a quality appraisal of the Library and resources.
• What did you learn?
• How do you locate and evaluate sources of evidence?
• Which electronic database would you use most and what types of search words would you use?
• What are the strengths?
• What are the weaknesses?
• Is it adequate? Why or why not?

Step 3: Write

• Write a paper that addresses the questions above.

Write a 2-page paper in APA format on any healthcare topic that piques your interest.

-Must utilize the library website to conduct a literature review to find relevant peer-reviewed articles and to format APA will discuss resources in class

-Use at least 3 peer-reviewed journal articles that are not older than 5 years.

-Must contain an APA cover page and Reference List.

-Must contain in text citations.

-Must contain an introduction, body and summary.

-Use at least 3-5 journal articles.

-Follow APA 7 Guidelines to complete this assignment.

you have to use those specific references I have provided