Assignment Instructions This week, you learned about the five-factor approach to understanding personality. Applying this model in the workplace can be beneficial. For example, as an employee, you can identify traits that are helpful or challenging to your success and communication with others. As a leader, you can recognize personality traits in the people you manage and leverage diverse personalities for more effective work outcomes. In this assessment, you will explore and describe your personality based on a well-known, modern research trait theory: the five-factor model of personality (also known as the Big Five personality traits). Additionally, you will consider how to use your personality traits to guide your interactions in the workplace. Assessment Preparation Review the following scenario: Your employer has invited you to apply for a new role as a team supervisor at the organization you work for. As part of the application process, you must take the Big Five test and write a personal statement in which you explain how and why you are a good fit for the supervisory role, based on the results of the test. Take the Big Five Test. This test is a tool used to understand various aspects of a persons personality in 5 domains: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience. Completing the test will help you understand your personality strengths and identify areas for growth. You will use your test results to complete this assessment. Assessment Deliverable Write a 700- to 1,050-word personal statement in which you explore the role of personality in emotional and behavioral interactions. Include the following headings and information in your personal statement: Introduction Summarize your Big Five profile. What did the test results reveal about your personality? Past Employment Reflection Describe how your Big Five profile can explain your employment history or career development. Future Employment Reflection Describe how you might use your understanding of your Big Five profile to manage your emotions and behaviors in the supervisory role. Explain how you might use your understanding of your Big Five profile to build relationships and rapport with people you work with (e.g., stakeholders, colleagues, other supervisors, supervisees, customers/clients). Cite at least 2 scholarly sources, in addition to the textbook, according to APA formatting and guidelines.
Category: uncategorised
-
Anthropology Question
1st Short Paper Assignment: Papers should be uploaded on to Blackboard via the Turnitin link under [Assignments], no later than Feb 13 This should be c. 5 pages in length (double-spaced: about 1,250 words and up to a max of 2,000), with an additional Works Cited section (include this even if you only cite the textbooks for the class– it’s good practice). For this paper, I would like you to integrate material from lectures, and from the readings. Additional resources are encouraged, but not required. Topic: Discuss one way (or some of the ways) in which Native Americans and Native American culture have influenced your life, personally. You might want to discuss Native agricultural developments like the potato, chocolate, rubber, corn. Or you could try ideology, such as women’s rights, environmentalism, democracy, individual freedom, or the like. Perhaps you like to kayak, or play lacrosse. You can discuss your ideas with your discussion leader.
You have to use the stuff she asks so please look online for it. it also has to be personally based off me so if you have any questions about me please ask. Both my parents are immagrants from IRAN as background and i speak farsi and English.
do not use chatgbt. here are the classes requiered books Required Books
Native Peoples of North America. Susan Stebbins. (SS in the schedule,
below). Available freely online, e.g.Where The Lightning Strikes. Peter Nabokov. (PN in the schedule below).
Available at the USC Bookstore.
Indian Voices. Alison Owings (AO in the schedule below) (Available online
via USC Libraries)Requirements: how long it asks
-
Student Access Process Personal Statement
Okay so this is a personal statement to help me get into university. The statement is supposed to be a Personal Circumstances and Barriers. Describe the personal circumstances, systemic barriers, or lived experiences that have led you to apply through the Student Access Process. You may consider the following prompts to guide your response (you are not required to answer each one directly): – What challenges or barriers have affected your access to or experience with education? – What strategies, personal strengths, supports or resources have you used, or are currently using, to navigate or respond to these challenges or barriers?
- I have been through a traumatic experience of being sexual assaulted as a child
- while living in a volatile household disregarding me needs
- while I might also have inattentive Adhd
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Personal statement.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Unit VII Research Paper
This four-page research paper measures your mastery of ULOs 1.4, 2.6, 4.3, and 5.3.
Assignment Objective: You will write a four-page research paper on the topic of global hunger and poverty in which you will demonstrate your mastery of the moral theories covered in this course. The assignment will help you gain a better understanding of how moral theories help address real-world ethical issues.
Length: Your completed double-spaced essay must be at least four pages. Title and reference pages do not count towards the total page requirement.
References: You must use and cite at least two sources; one source must come from the CSU Online Library. Adhere to APA Style formatting for this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources used.
Details: Complete your assignment by addressing the following:
- In the first paragraph, introduce your paper by briefly describing the problem of hunger and poverty in the world and answering the question of whether we should help others who are suffering from hunger and poverty. Note: your answer to this question is the thesis statement for your paper and must take a position.
- In the second paragraph, choose a moral theory to support your argument. Be sure to define the theory you have chosen and explain why you decided to use it.
- In at least three body paragraphs, provide at least three reasons why we should or should not help others suffering in the world. Note: your reasons should apply the ideas of the moral theory you selected (i.e., we should help because it benefits the majority [result ethics or consequentialism], we should help because humans deserve help and it is the right thing to do [deontology], we should help because we are a global community [care ethics], etc.).
- Identify weaknesses in your argument in at least one body paragraph. What are the weaknesses of the moral theory when applied to this topic? Has evidence for both sides been fully considered?
- In a final paragraph, summarize the points that support your answer. This is the conclusion of your paper.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): UnitVII Study guide.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Week 6 Assignment: Signature Assignment: Case Study
In order to write a case study paper, you must carefully address a number of sections in a specific order with specific information contained in each. The guideline below outlines each of those sections.
Section
Information to Include
Introduction (patient and problem)
- Explain who the patient is (Age, gender, etc.)
- Explain what the problem is (What was he/she diagnosed with, or what happened?)
- Introduce your main argument (What should you as a nurse focus on or do?)
Pathogenesis
- Explain the development or evolution of the disease, from the initial stimulus (how etiologic factors alter physiologic function) to ultimate expression of manifestations of the disease and related complications.
- History
- Explain what health problems the patient has (Has she/he been diagnosed with other diseases?)
- Detail any and all previous treatments (Has she/he had any prior surgeries or is he/she on medication?)
Nursing Physical Assessment
- List all the patients health stats in sentences with specific numbers/levels (Blood pressure, bowel sounds, ambulation, etc.)
Related Treatments
- Explain what treatments the patient is receiving because of his/her disease
Nursing Diagnosis & Patient Goal
- Explain what your nursing diagnosis is (What is the main problem for this patient? What need to be addressed?)
- Explain what your goal is for helping the patient recover (What do you want to change for the patient?)
Nursing Interventions
- Explain how you will accomplish your nursing goals, and support this with citations (Reference the literature)
Evaluation
- Explain how effective the nursing intervention was (What happened after your nursing intervention? Did the patient get better?)
Recommendations
- Explain what the patient or nurse should do in the future to continue recovery/improvement
Your paper should be 10-12 pages in length and will be graded on how well you complete each of the above sections. You will also be graded on your use of APA style and on your application of nursing journals into the treatments and interventions. For integrating nursing journals, remember the following:
- Make sure to integrate citations into all of your paper
- Support all claims of what the disease is, why it occurs, and how to treat it with references to the literature on this disease
- Always use citations for information that you learned from a book or article; if you do not cite it, you are telling your reader that YOU discovered that information (how to treat the disease, etc.)
Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO THE FOLLOWING RUBIC
General Education Standardized Rubric: PATH 370 Signature Assignment
General Education Standardized Rubric: PATH 370 Signature Assignment
CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Introduction
3.5 to >3.12 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Introduction summarizes the case comprehensively and prepares the reader for the remainder of the paper.
3.12 to >2.52 pts
Meets Expectations
Introduction summarizes the case and somewhat prepares the reader for the remainder of the paper.
2.52 to >2.07 pts
Approaches Expectations
Introduction lacks detail to prepare the reader for the case.
2.07 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Introduction is not present or is grossly erroneous.
3.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Pathophysiology
8.1 to >7.21 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Identifies and thoroughly explains the pathogenesis of the disease topic. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, supported and sufficient.
7.21 to >5.83 pts
Meets Expectations
Mostly Identifies and thoroughly explains the pathogenesis of the disease topic. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.
5.83 to >4.78 pts
Approaches Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary or supported with evidence and a sound rationale.
4.78 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not answer or answers incorrectly with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.
8.1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
History, Physical and Related Treatments
8.4 to >7.48 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Provides a detailed patient history, physical assessment findings, treatment, and related treatments for the disease topic. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, supported and sufficient.
7.48 to >6.05 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides most patient history, physical assessment findings, treatment, and related treatments for the disease topic. but may be limited. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.
6.05 to >4.96 pts
Approaches Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary or supported with evidence and a sound rationale.
4.96 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not answer or answers incorrectly with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.
8.4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Nursing Diagnosis and Patient Goals
8.1 to >7.21 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Provides thorough and detailed nursing diagnosis and patient goal. Information is scientifically sound, supported and sufficient.
7.21 to >5.83 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides mostly detailed nursing diagnosis and patient goal. Information is mostly scientifically sound, support and sufficient.
5.83 to >4.78 pts
Approaches Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. Does not address the context sufficiently or with sound rationale.
4.78 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not answer or incorrectly explains content.Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient
8.1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Nursing Interventions
8.1 to >7.21 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Thoroughly details the nursing interventions. Detailed explanation of nursing goals.Rationale is thorough, supported and sufficient.
7.21 to >5.83 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides some details of the nursing interventions. Detailed explanation of nursing goals.Rationale is supported and mostly sufficient.
5.83 to >4.78 pts
Approaches Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. Does not address the context sufficiently or with sound rationale.
4.78 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not answer or answers incorrectly with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.
8.1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Evaluation
8.1 to >7.21 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Provides thorough and insightful explanation of the effectiveness of the nursing intervention. Information is scientifically sound, supported andsufficient in detail
7.21 to >5.83 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides most thorough and insightful explanation of the effectiveness of the nursing intervention. Information is mostly scientifically sound, supported but may lack detail in some areas.
5.83 to >4.78 pts
Approaches Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations of the effectiveness of the nursing interventions. Does not address the context sufficiently or with sound rationale.
4.78 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not answer or answers incorrectly with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.
8.1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Recommendations
8.1 to >7.21 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Provides an overall thorough explanation of patient recommendations.Clinical findings are supported with evidence, compared and rationalized thoroughly. Recommendations for continued recovery/improvement explained and supported.
7.21 to >5.83 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides an overall thorough explanation of patient recommendations.Some clinical findings are supported with evidence, compared and rationalized thoroughly. Recommendations for continued recovery/improvement explained and supported.
5.83 to >4.78 pts
Approaches Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations. Information is not entirely scientifically sound, necessary and sufficient. Does not address the context sufficiently or with sound rationale
4.78 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not answer or answers incorrectly with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient.
8.1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
APA format and References
7 to >6.23 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Meets all the requirements related to length. There is a minimum of 3 scholarly resources with at least 1 non-internet source. All references are correctly cited in APA format. The student shows a solid grasp of APA formatting, paraphrasing and citations.
6.23 to >5.04 pts
Meets Expectations
Meets most of the requirements related to length. There is a minimum of 3 resources with at least 1 non-internet source; the references may be questionable or not scholarly in nature. Most references are correctly cited in APA format. The student shows a good grasp of APA formatting, paraphrasing and citations but needs refinement in some areas.
5.04 to >4.13 pts
Approaches Expectations
Meets some of the requirements related to length but is lacking enough to impede the meaning of the paper. The references do not meet required count and/or may be questionable or not scholarly in nature. References are not correctly cited in APA format. The student does not show a good grasp of APA formatting, paraphrasing and citations.
4.13 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not follow format, length and layout requirements. References are not present or do not support scholarly intention. A lack of effort it apparent. There are extensive errors in formatting.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Mechanics
5.6 to >4.98 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated.The writing is free of spelling and grammatical errors.
4.98 to >4.03 pts
Meets Expectations
Answers are well written throughout and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. It is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.
4.03 to >3.3 pts
Approaches Expectations
Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors
3.3 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Answers are not well written and the information is poorly organized and lacks clarity. It contains many spelling and grammatical errors
5.6 pts
-
discussion 500 words
A 41-year-old male patient presents at the community walk-in clinic with complaints of severe elbow pain radiating into the forearm. His 13-year-old daughter is serving as a translator because her father is unable to speak English and understands only a few words in English. The daughter explains that he has been taking Tylenol to manage pain, but the pain is getting worse and is keeping him from working. You ask the daughter to describe the type of work her father does, and you notice she is hesitant to respond, first checking with her father. He responds, and she translates that he works in construction. Based on the response and the apparent concern, you suspect that the patient may be an undocumented worker. Further conversation reveals that several members of the family are working with the same local construction company.
- You suspect the pain reported as coming from the elbow and radiating down the forearm is caused by repetitive motions, perhaps indicating lateral epicondylitis. What can you do to confirm this diagnosis?
- While performing the physical examination, you ask the patient, through his daughter, if he has reported this injury to his employer, because the injury is most likely work-related. The daughter responded without consulting her father that this is an old injury that happened before he started working at his current place of employment. You could tell that she was becoming more distressed. What is the most likely explanation for her concern?
- Visual inspection reveals erythema around the affected area with no evidence of overlying skin lesions, scars, or deformities. What other assessments should you perform?
- How is lateral epicondylitis treated?
- When discussing possible treatment approaches, you notice that the patient is very worried and seems to suggest to his daughter that they should leave. The daughter begins trying to explain why they have to leave right away. What would you tell the patient and his daughter to help them feel comfortable staying for treatment?
Submission Instructions:
- Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources within the last 5 years
Requirements: n/a
-
Research Report
For this assignment, you will engage in original data collection by going into the community to gather public opinion data on a correctional-related topic of your choice. (topic is women in corrections) After selecting your topic, you must collect primary data through a short survey administered to a minimum of 20 people. You will then provide copies of surveys to confirm data collection. After collecting your data, you will analyze the results and compose a 9-10 page research report (excluding cover page, references, and appendices) summarizing your methodology, findings, and interpretation. This report should contextualize results around implications for correctional policy and practice. In addition to the final research report, you will be asked to create a digital narrated presentation that overviews the seminal findings from your data. In total, you will create whatever number of slides you feel adequately capture your data, then briefly narrate over top slides by explaining the material contained within them. Your presentations should not exceed 5 minutes in length -
A Written Monologue Related to an Ethical Issues Paper
in this paper, the goal is to apply ethical concepts previously learned to a specific ethical dilemma. Or, you may choose to do write an Opt-Ed paper.
First, you might want to google the word “monologue” for clear definition and description of the word.
Before completing this assignment, please read the following articles and website:
Below are suggested topics for your ethical issues paper:
- Artificial Intelligence in nursing
- Ethical issues in research
- Genetics in Nursing
- Horizontal fashion incivility and vertical incivility
- Incivility in the profession – Example: Expert RN towards Novice Nurses
- Informatics in Nursing
- Resources for Impaired Nurses
- Robotics
- Scholarship in Nursing by Boyer
- The new competencies for BSN degree nurses
- Violence – Example: bullying
The paper should be organized and systematic in manner. The content should:
- be your original work
- flow and be easy to read
- be no more than 5 pages (including the cover page and the reference page)
- adhere to
- (includes introduction, body, conclusion) with correct grammar and spelling are expected
-
Numerical method for differential equation
Requirements: File
-
Discussion 500 words
A 41-year-old male patient presents at the community walk-in clinic with complaints of severe elbow pain radiating into the forearm. His 13-year-old daughter is serving as a translator because her father is unable to speak English and understands only a few words in English. The daughter explains that he has been taking Tylenol to manage pain, but the pain is getting worse and is keeping him from working. You ask the daughter to describe the type of work her father does, and you notice she is hesitant to respond, first checking with her father. He responds, and she translates that he works in construction. Based on the response and the apparent concern, you suspect that the patient may be an undocumented worker. Further conversation reveals that several members of the family are working with the same local construction company.
- You suspect the pain reported as coming from the elbow and radiating down the forearm is caused by repetitive motions, perhaps indicating lateral epicondylitis. What can you do to confirm this diagnosis?
- While performing the physical examination, you ask the patient, through his daughter, if he has reported this injury to his employer, because the injury is most likely work-related. The daughter responded without consulting her father that this is an old injury that happened before he started working at his current place of employment. You could tell that she was becoming more distressed. What is the most likely explanation for her concern?
- Visual inspection reveals erythema around the affected area with no evidence of overlying skin lesions, scars, or deformities. What other assessments should you perform?
- How is lateral epicondylitis treated?
- When discussing possible treatment approaches, you notice that the patient is very worried and seems to suggest to his daughter that they should leave. The daughter begins trying to explain why they have to leave right away. What would you tell the patient and his daughter to help them feel comfortable staying for treatment?
Submission Instructions:
- Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources within the last 5 years
Requirements: 500 words the discussion