Category: uncategorised

Directions Write your Data Analysis and Presentation of Data, the third section of Chapter 4. Revise and apply all feedback to the Introduction and Methods of Evaluation sections. The following should be included in the Data Analysis and Presentation of Data section: Describe your research subjects and/or other descriptive data. Review Samples and How to Set up a Table per APA (Word)Links to an external site. to help guide you. Include the figures (after editing, if needed) you created for Discussion 3.1 Figures: Charts and Graphs. Quantitative and/or qualitative methods: Describe the variables and what statistical analyses were used and why. Variability: Specify the degree of variability expected in implementation, the change expected in primary outcomes (effect size), and the ability of the study design (including sample size) to detect those effects. This may include standard deviation or standard error depending on your chosen statistical test. Effect of Time: Describe analytic methods to demonstrate effects of time as a variable. Was the timeframe of the project sufficient to collect data for an adequate sample size? Was there enough time to determine if the intervention was effective? What to Submit Your Introduction, Methods of Evaluation, Data Analysis and Presentation of Data, and References in Microsoft Word, in APA professional format If you copy and paste references from the course into your assignment, be sure to confirm APA formatting before submitting. Similarity Score After submitting your assignment, select Submission Details to view your similarity score. Your similarity score will appear as a percentage next to your submitted file. It may take up to 24 hours for your similarity score to appear. 1. see attached: Samples and How to Set up a Table per APA (Word) 2. see attached: Discussion 3.1 Figures: Charts and Graphs.

This week is also an opportunity to reflect on what you have accomplished this term and how it has contributed to your growth as a writer. Consider Gilberts (2014) video, , and or from your learning activities as you explore the opportunity to continue advocating for change and growing as a writer. Then, complete the following steps below:

1. In the first paragraph, reflect on your presentation by answering one of the questions below and connecting it to this units reading:

• What did you learn about digital media design?
• What changes would you make to your digital media presentation, including visual enhancements, if you wanted to disseminate it to a wider audience via social media sites? Revisit from last week to get some specific ideas about what you could improve.
• Do you think your presentation could generate change, and do you foresee pursuing this argument for change in the future?

2. In the second paragraph, reflect on your growth as a persuasive communicator this term by answering at least two questions in a well-developed paragraph. How have your ideas about persuasive communication changed?

• How did what you learned about effective persuasion and logical argument in CM220 help you in your current job or other classes? How might it benefit you in your future career?
• What did you learn about research that you think will be beneficial in the future?
• What improvements did you see in your writing after completing CM220?
• What advice would you like to share with future students in CM220 about the class?
• Do you think this course will make you more likely to advocate for changes in your community?

3. Wrap up your post with at least one open-ended question for your classmates as you consider the next steps for community engagement or future writing goals.

Reference the Reading:

Refer to and credit the unit reading concepts to help validate your ideas and give you practice with using and crediting source information. When you refer to concepts from the units reading, be sure to use a signal phrase like According to . . . [name of reading]. If you are directly quoting the reading or another source, be sure to use quotation marks and cite the source using proper APA in-text citations and full references. See the Purdue Global Writing Centers for resources on APA citation formatting.

Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.

Introduction

Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.

Instructions

Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you. (I added a description of the patient i chose)

Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:

• Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.
• Review the article for the following criteria:
• Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).
• Credibility factors.
• Importance of content to selected diagnosis.
• The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.
• Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the document). You can refer to the instructions in the document.
• Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.
• Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used. (I will add my self)
• Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you’ve found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?
• Include a link to your article.
• Include a reference to your article in APA format.

Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

• Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.
• Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.
• Identify the credibility factors of an article.
• Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.
• Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
• Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.
• Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
• Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article