Category: uncategorised

Essay Length tips–To answer these topics completely, it takes about 2 pages – 8-10 paragraphs. Use the topic questions and the scoring rubric to see if your draft responds fully to all parts of the question. A complete thoughtful answer is more important than word count. Topic A: What is the fallacy of Straw Man? How is it different than simply disagreeing with someone elses point of view? Use the material in Vaughn’s book to help you give a detailed explanation of what the mistake in a Straw Man is. To demonstrate your understanding and to teach the idea to the rest of the class, provide a relevant real-life example of the logical mistake. (You MAY use an outside source to help you present your example; be sure to summarize or paraphrase, cite, and use announcing verbs.) Choose carefully – consider whether your example does a good job of illustrating a Straw Man. Contrast it to other fallacies, and show why your example is a Straw Man. The discussion of your example should be detailed so that readers can evaluate the fallacy. Argue the case for why your example is, indeed, an example of Straw Man rather than another fallacy. BOOK INFO Philosophy Here and Now Edition: 4th ISBN: 9780197543344 Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication date: May 2021 Format: EPUB

this is the link to the video that I have to watch Benchmark Ethical Vignette Paper Assignment Instructions Overview Counselors must abide by the ACA Code of Ethics, the laws and regulations of their state in which they practice, and federal laws. Understanding and knowing these standards, laws, and regulations are imperative to a counselors practice standards. This assignment helps you become familiar with the ethical decision-making model, ACA Code of Ethics, state laws and regulations, and federal laws. You will learn how to apply both ethical standards and laws to common ethical scenarios. Instructions You will choose between 2 videos in Module 4 of your Canvas course. After selecting the video you would like to utilize for the assignment, you will write a response paper according to the detailed instructions below. Your paper must be in current APA format (title page, abstract, introduction, conclusion, reference page, etc.). The body of your paper must be 3-5 pages and your paper must include at least 4 scholarly references published within the last 5 years. Citations for both the ACA Code of Ethics and your state code of ethics must be included and count towards the 4 required scholarly references. Note that the title page and reference page do not count toward the required page length. Your paper must be well-thought-out and demonstrate critical thinking. Also, all references must be from professional sources (professional academic journals and professional texts; no informal websites; no materials from courses within the degree program). Step 1: Choose one watch item (How Can you Understand? or To Self-Disclose or Not?) from the assigned module to complete this assignment. Step 2: When you watch the video, step into the shoes of the counselor (as though you are the counselor in the scenario you watched). Now that the scenario presented has happened to you, read the Practitioners Guide to Ethical Decision-Making. Read each step carefully. For this assignment, pay specific attention to steps 1-4 of the ethical decision-making model as these steps will become the headings for your paper as outlined in Step 4 below. Step 3: Read the remaining assignment instructions in their entirety. Then, watch the selected video again while taking copious notes to identify the problem. Step 4: Divide your paper into the following required headings and answer the questions below in 1st person: Identify the problem Clearly state the facts of the scenario. Do not provide innuendos, assumptions, hypotheses, or suspicions. Correctly and clearly identify the problem(s) in the scenario. Answer the following questions: Is this problem an ethical, legal, professional, clinical, or technology problem? Is it a combination of more than one of these? Apply the ACA Code of Ethics Identify two to three applicable standards from the 2014 ACA Code of Ethics. Which standards apply, or can address, the problem(s) presented in the scenario? Make sure to cite the standard numbers and state how the standards apply to the scenario. Applicable State Codes/Laws and Federal Mental Health Laws Which ethical codes from your state licensure laws, rules, or practice act apply to this scenario? Correctly and clearly identify any Federal Mental Health Laws that apply to this scenario. Make sure to include the code number(s) and state how the code(s) apply to the scenario. Determine the Nature and Dimensions of the Dilemma Identify which ACA moral principle(s) apply to this scenario: autonomy, beneficence, justice, nonmaleficence, fidelity, and/or veracity? How do the identified principle(s) apply to the scenario? If more than one applies, determine which one is priority based on the problem identified in the scenario. Review relevant professional literature from professional refereed journals related to the identified problem and moral principle to find the most recent professional thinking regarding the ethical dilemma. Materials must be outside of your textbooks, course materials, and materials from other classes. You need at least 2 journal articles published in the last 5 years. (Remember that you need 4 sources total; 2 of your sources will include the ACA Code and your state laws.) Provide two experienced professional counselors (supervisors, peers, etc.) who also abide by the ACA Code of Ethics and two state and/or national professional counseling organizations you will consult to help you with the dilemma. PLEASE NOTE: You are not required to interview these professionals, but list them in your paper as part of your process. Generate Potential course of action Identify 4 potential courses of action to explain how you would address or resolve the ethical issue presented. Make sure this section is written in 1st person and fully addresses the problem. You are not preventing the problem. For each potential action item, provide evidence from the literature to support your approach. NOTE: Do not state that you will work through the ethical decision-making model as part of your action plan. This IS the ethical decision-making model. You need at least 2 scholarly journal articles published in the last 5 years. Step 5: When you have completed your paper, save it as a Microsoft Word document under your name and assignment title (Example: Doe_J_Ethical_Vignette_Paper). Submit your paper via the assignment submission link in Canvas. You must also submit this benchmark paper to CORE. NOTE: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool AND the AI tool. If the final paper you submit contains entire sentences or paragraphs that have a high similarity index to other sources, it may indicate either unintentional or intentional plagiarism. If your paper results in an AI score of 20% or higher, your instructor must submit this information to the administration. Please carefully review the academic dishonesty policies and the full program handbook for additional information.