Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • the first assignment is due tomorrow the others are due thur…

    please put all assignments on separate papers and the one for cheryl ill upload title page

    Graphic organizer assignment CUR 719 due tomorrow

    CRJ 650- Weekly ch 3, 4, 5,

    cheryl-

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): graphic organizer.docx, Weekly Review Chapter 3 Overview (What is Victimology).pdf, Weekly Review Chapter 5 – An Overview.pdf, Weekly Review Chapter 4 An Overview.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Psychology research

    Assignment Instructions To complete the WK5 Research Assignment, follow all the instructions in the attached worksheet (see below). *You need to know your group’s specific research question (determined during the last Recitation class) in order to complete this research assignment. If you missed class/don’t know what that is, contact your group members immediately! Completing this assignment on an article unrelated to your group’s topic will result in a zero.* You must use PsycInfo through the SU Library (use your NetId to sign in) to conduct an initial literature search for a peer-reviewed, empirical journal article that helps to answer your groups research question. Save all completed work as a Word or PDF document before submitting. ONLY these file types will be accepted! You must submit BOTH a PDF of your highlighted or annotated article AND your completed WK5 Research Assignment worksheet to earn full credit.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): PSY205 – WK5 Research Assignment – RUBRIC_S26.docx, PSY205_WK5 Research Assignment_WORKSHEET_S26t.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • 49 Week 1

    Advocacy is a fundamental component of professional nursing practice and essential to quality patient care. For this week’s discussion, please address the following. Ensure you incorporate content from the required reading to support your content.

    Part 1: Define Nurse Advocacy

    • In your own words, what does nurse advocacy mean to you as a nursing professional?
    • How would you explain the concept of advocacy to someone outside the healthcare field?

    Part 2: Types of Advocacy

    • Describe patient advocacy and its role in nursing practice
    • Describe professional advocacy and its role in nursing practice
    • How do these two types of advocacy differ, and how might they overlap in your daily work?

    Part 3: Importance of Both Types

    • Explain why patient advocacy is crucial to quality nursing care and patient outcomes
    • Explain why professional advocacy is important for the nursing profession and healthcare system
    • What might happen if nurses neglect either type of advocacy?

    Part 4: Personal Practice Examples

    • Provide a specific example from your own clinical experience where you engaged in patient advocacy (maintain confidentiality by using no identifying information)
    • Provide a specific example from your own experience where you engaged in professional advocacy or witnessed it in action
    • Reflect on how these experiences shaped your understanding of your role as a nurse advocate

    I’ve made sure to open the week 1 article. Please site 1 scholars nursing source. Less than 5 years

    Title page must only say Institution

    I’ve included the guidelines for this discussion please carefully read through everything.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): PFC week 1 Article Orchard-1.pdf, Article Bourgeois 2018 OpenNotes-1.pdf, Guidelines for writing a scholarly discussion post.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Nurse week 5

    USE OUTLINED PROVIDED see attachments FOLLOW THESE INSTRUCTIONS NUR ASSIGNMENT WEEK 5 Huston, C. J. (2022). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. Chapter 15,16, 17 Purpose: Understand the significance of interprofessional collaboration in improving patient care outcomes. Identify key techniques and strategies for facilitating effective collaboration and teamwork in healthcare teams. Analyze common barriers to collaboration and develop solutions for overcoming these challenges. Reflect on personal experiences and observations to enhance understanding of interprofessional collaboration in healthcare settings. Instructions: In this assignment, you will explore techniques for facilitating collaboration and teamwork within interprofessional healthcare teams. You will analyze the importance of effective communication, shared decision-making, and mutual respect in achieving positive patient outcomes. Additionally, you will identify strategies for overcoming common barriers to collaboration and promoting a culture of teamwork in healthcare settings. Write a literature review on the importance of interprofessional collaboration in healthcare settings. Identify at least five peer-reviewed articles that discuss techniques and strategies for facilitating collaboration and teamwork within interprofessional healthcare teams. Include your action plan, brainstorming, outline, and timeline in the appendices section of your literature review. 1. develop an action plan for promoting interprofessional collaboration in your healthcare setting. Submit this in the appendices section. 2. Brainstorm strategies for fostering effective communication, enhancing team dynamics, and resolving conflicts. Submit this in the appendices section. 3. Outline specific steps, responsibilities, and timelines for implementing the action plan within the healthcare setting. Submit this in the appendices section. Submit a plan describing role responsibilities for your group in the appendices section of your literature review. Requirements The literature review is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling. The literature review should be formatted per current APA 7 minimum of 5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. NO AI NO PLAGIARISM

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Week 5 extras.pdf, Week 5 assignment-outline.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Case study

    A 55-year-old man was admitted to the emergency room in respiratory distress. He complains of worsening shortness of breath over a 48 hour time period. He is only able to speak in short sentences and is slightly obtunded. His skin is slightly cool and clammy to touch. Urine output is < 20mL/hour. His oxygen saturation in the ER is 84% while on room air and heart rate is 143. His blood pressure is 138/99. You notice rapid breathing at a frequency of 37 bpm. You auscultate diffuse crackles throughout all dependent regions of the lungs. The patient is lying back in a recumbent position saying that he feels like he is suffocating. Arterial blood gas analysis results are pH-7.19, PaCO2-25, PaO2-52, HCO3– 22.

    Instructions:

    • Produce an essay.
    • Rank at least 2 different abnormal conditions in this case study that are increasing the drive to breath.
    • Differentiate how the central and peripheral chemoreceptors are responding to the conditions in this case study.
    • Identify the role of the dorsal respiratory group and ventral respiratory group in the respiratory centers.

    null

    Requirements: 500 words?

  • What is the science

    Science is the systematic study of the natural world through observation and experiments.

    In simple words:

    Science helps us understand how and why things happen around us.

    Key Points:

    It is based on facts and evidence.

    It uses observation, experiments, and testing.

    It helps us discover laws and principles of nature.

    Examples:

    Why do objects fall down? Gravity (Physics)

    How do plants make food? Photosynthesis (Biology)

    What happens when iron rusts? Chemical reaction (Chemistry)

    Main Branches of Science:

    Physics Study of energy, force, motion, electricity, etc.

    Chemistry Study of substances and chemical reactions.

    Biology Study of living things

    Requirements:

  • 49 Week 1

    Advocacy is a fundamental component of professional nursing practice and essential to quality patient care. For this week’s discussion, please address the following. Ensure you incorporate content from the required reading to support your content.

    Part 1: Define Nurse Advocacy

    • In your own words, what does nurse advocacy mean to you as a nursing professional?
    • How would you explain the concept of advocacy to someone outside the healthcare field?

    Part 2: Types of Advocacy

    • Describe patient advocacy and its role in nursing practice
    • Describe professional advocacy and its role in nursing practice
    • How do these two types of advocacy differ, and how might they overlap in your daily work?

    Part 3: Importance of Both Types

    • Explain why patient advocacy is crucial to quality nursing care and patient outcomes
    • Explain why professional advocacy is important for the nursing profession and healthcare system
    • What might happen if nurses neglect either type of advocacy?

    Part 4: Personal Practice Examples

    • Provide a specific example from your own clinical experience where you engaged in patient advocacy (maintain confidentiality by using no identifying information)
    • Provide a specific example from your own experience where you engaged in professional advocacy or witnessed it in action
    • Reflect on how these experiences shaped your understanding of your role as a nurse advocate

    I’ve made sure to open the week 1 article. Please site 1 scholars nursing source. Less than 5 years

    Title page must only say Institution

    I’ve included the guidelines for this discussion please carefully read through everything.

  • Assess Styles and Strengths

    To apply the concepts of communications forms and models to real-world personal examples by monitoring and then explaining actual episodes of communications. Create a pie chart.

  • Current Issues in Education Media Project

    Submit your completed project in this assignment link.

    Current Issues in Education Media Presentation (Fall 2023)

    Current Issues in Education Media Presentation (Fall 2023)

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Guiding Question

    5 pts

    Guiding question specifically and clearly address the issue.

    4 pts

    Guiding question needs little improvement in clarity.

    3 pts

    Guiding question needs much improvement in clarity (2-3 points possible).

    1 pts

    Guiding question is not at all clearly stated; and/or is missing (0-1 point possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Thesis Statement

    5 pts

    Thesis statement clearly reflects at least three main points.

    4 pts

    Thesis statement and main points need little improvement in clarity.

    3 pts

    Thesis statement and main points need much improvement in clarity (2-3 points possible).

    1 pts

    Thesis statement and main points are not at all clearly stated; and/or are missing (0-1 point possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Main Points

    20 pts

    At least three main points clearly presented and explained.

    15 pts

    At least two main points clearly presented and explained; and/or main points need little improvement in clarity (15-19 points possible).

    10 pts

    At least two main points presented; and/or main points need much improvement in clarity (10-14 points possible).

    5 pts

    One main point presented; and or main points are not at all clearly stated (0-9 points possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Supporting Details

    20 pts

    Supporting details provided for all three main points; details clearly presented, directly relevant; add sufficient depth and interest.

    15 pts

    Supporting details provided for two main points; and/or details need little improvement in relevance, depth, and interest (15-19 points possible).

    10 pts

    Supporting details provided for two main points; and/or details need much improvement in relevance, depth, and interest (10-14 points possible).

    5 pts

    Supporting details provided for one main point; and/or no supporting details included (0-9 points possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Call to Action

    20 pts

    Call to Action is clear, specific, compelling, and directly relevant.

    15 pts

    Call to Action needs little improvement in clarity, specificity, impact, and relevance (15-19 points possible).

    10 pts

    Call to Action needs much improvement in clarity, specificity, impact, and relevance (10-14 points possible).

    5 pts

    Call to Action is missing; and/or not at all clear, specific, compelling, or relevant (0-9 points possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Presentation Design

    10 pts

    Presentation includes 10-16 slides; follows recommendations for design; includes images that clearly support the text/topic.

    7 pts

    Presentation includes 10-16 slides; needs little improvement in design and use of images (7-9 points possible).

    5 pts

    Presentation includes 10-16 slides; and/or needs much improvement in design and use of images (5-6 points possible).

    3 pts

    Presentation includes fewer than 10 slides; and/or does not at all follow recommendations for design; very few or no images are included (0-4 points possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Written Communication -Organization -Coherence -Clarity -Transitions -Formal, academic language -Grammar -Punctuation -Capitalization -Spelling

    10 pts

    One to two errors.

    7 pts

    Three to four errors (7-9 points possible).

    5 pts

    Four to six errors (5-6 points possible).

    3 pts

    Seven or more errors (0-4 points possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    APA Guidelines 1. Title slide 2. Spacing 3. In-text citations 4. Images cited 5 Reference slide

    10 pts

    Four to five guidelines followed.

    7 pts

    Three guidelines followed (7-9 points possible).

    5 pts

    Two guidelines followed (5-6 points possible).

    3 pts

    One guideline followed (1-4 points possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): EDUC 1301 Current Issues in Education Directions and Rubric.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Current Issues in Education Media Project

    Submit your completed project in this assignment link.

    Current Issues in Education Media Presentation (Fall 2023)

    Current Issues in Education Media Presentation (Fall 2023)

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Guiding Question

    5 pts

    Guiding question specifically and clearly address the issue.

    4 pts

    Guiding question needs little improvement in clarity.

    3 pts

    Guiding question needs much improvement in clarity (2-3 points possible).

    1 pts

    Guiding question is not at all clearly stated; and/or is missing (0-1 point possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Thesis Statement

    5 pts

    Thesis statement clearly reflects at least three main points.

    4 pts

    Thesis statement and main points need little improvement in clarity.

    3 pts

    Thesis statement and main points need much improvement in clarity (2-3 points possible).

    1 pts

    Thesis statement and main points are not at all clearly stated; and/or are missing (0-1 point possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Main Points

    20 pts

    At least three main points clearly presented and explained.

    15 pts

    At least two main points clearly presented and explained; and/or main points need little improvement in clarity (15-19 points possible).

    10 pts

    At least two main points presented; and/or main points need much improvement in clarity (10-14 points possible).

    5 pts

    One main point presented; and or main points are not at all clearly stated (0-9 points possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Supporting Details

    20 pts

    Supporting details provided for all three main points; details clearly presented, directly relevant; add sufficient depth and interest.

    15 pts

    Supporting details provided for two main points; and/or details need little improvement in relevance, depth, and interest (15-19 points possible).

    10 pts

    Supporting details provided for two main points; and/or details need much improvement in relevance, depth, and interest (10-14 points possible).

    5 pts

    Supporting details provided for one main point; and/or no supporting details included (0-9 points possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Call to Action

    20 pts

    Call to Action is clear, specific, compelling, and directly relevant.

    15 pts

    Call to Action needs little improvement in clarity, specificity, impact, and relevance (15-19 points possible).

    10 pts

    Call to Action needs much improvement in clarity, specificity, impact, and relevance (10-14 points possible).

    5 pts

    Call to Action is missing; and/or not at all clear, specific, compelling, or relevant (0-9 points possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Presentation Design

    10 pts

    Presentation includes 10-16 slides; follows recommendations for design; includes images that clearly support the text/topic.

    7 pts

    Presentation includes 10-16 slides; needs little improvement in design and use of images (7-9 points possible).

    5 pts

    Presentation includes 10-16 slides; and/or needs much improvement in design and use of images (5-6 points possible).

    3 pts

    Presentation includes fewer than 10 slides; and/or does not at all follow recommendations for design; very few or no images are included (0-4 points possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Written Communication -Organization -Coherence -Clarity -Transitions -Formal, academic language -Grammar -Punctuation -Capitalization -Spelling

    10 pts

    One to two errors.

    7 pts

    Three to four errors (7-9 points possible).

    5 pts

    Four to six errors (5-6 points possible).

    3 pts

    Seven or more errors (0-4 points possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    APA Guidelines 1. Title slide 2. Spacing 3. In-text citations 4. Images cited 5 Reference slide

    10 pts

    Four to five guidelines followed.

    7 pts

    Three guidelines followed (7-9 points possible).

    5 pts

    Two guidelines followed (5-6 points possible).

    3 pts

    One guideline followed (1-4 points possible).

    0 pts

    Item not attempted.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): EDUC 1301 Current Issues in Education Directions and Rubric.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.