Deliverable 6 – Second Opinion

Assignment Instructions

Competency

Analyze the psychopathology and neurobiology of personality disorders.

Student Success Criteria

View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the This item is graded with a rubric link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.

Scenario

As a new psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner (PMHNP), you are now working with RNs regularly. You notice that the nurses attitudes shift when a patient with borderline personality disorder presents to the clinic. It becomes clear that the staff does not have a full understanding of personality disorders. You decide to develop a presentation about personality disorders to deliver to the staff at your clinic.

Instructions

Create a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation with notes and record a presentation comparing personality disorders within a cluster. In your presentation, you must:

  • Choose any cluster (e.g., Cluster A, Cluster B, or Cluster C)
  • Describe the personality disorders in the cluster
  • Highlight contributing factors and etiology statement regarding the neurobiology
  • Discuss clinical features and major diagnostic criteria that distinguish it from other personality disorders, including supporting evidence
  • DO NOT RECORD THE AUDIO DIRECTLY ON THE POWERPOINT SLIDES
  • RECORD A VIDEO OF YOU NARRATING THE SLIDES.
  • DO NOT SUBMIT A .ZIP FILE – SUBMIT THE FILES INDIVIDUALLY, ALL IN THE SAME SUBMISSION BOX.
  • DO NOT SUBMIT THE VIDEO FILE ITSELF SUBMIT A LINK TO VIDEO, OR RECORD THE VIDEO DIRECTLY IN BLACKBOARD.

      Criterion 1

      0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryComprehensive description of the personality disorders in the cluster.0B – 3 – ProficiencyComplete description of the personality disorders in the cluster.0C – 2 – CompetenceReasonable description of the personality disorders in the cluster.0F – 1 – No PassRudimentary description of the personality disorders in the cluster.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0

      Criterion 2

      0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryComprehensive description of contributing factors and etiology statement regarding the neurobiology, supported by significant evidence.0B – 3 – ProficiencyComplete description of contributing factors and etiology statement regarding the neurobiology, supported by substantial evidence.0C – 2 – CompetenceReasonable description of contributing factors and etiology statement regarding the neurobiology, supported by some evidence.0F – 1 – No PassRudimentary description of contributing factors and etiology statement regarding the neurobiology, supported by little evidence.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0

      Criterion 3

      0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryComprehensive discussion of clinical features and major diagnostic criteria that distinguish the cluster from other personality disorders, including extensive supporting evidence.0B – 3 – ProficiencyComplete discussion of clinical features and major diagnostic criteria that distinguish the cluster from other personality disorders, including sufficient supporting evidence.0C – 2 – CompetenceReasonable discussion of clinical features and major diagnostic criteria that distinguish the cluster from other personality disorders, including some supporting evidence.0F – 1 – No PassRudimentary discussion of the clinical features and major diagnostic criteria that distinguish the cluster from other personality disorders, including little supporting evidence.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0

      Criterion 4

      0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryExemplary use of professional language that is free of bias, and thoroughly supported with evidence (in-text citations and references in the correct APA style). Established a concisely stated scholarly position appropriate for purpose, format, style, and audience and free of errors.0B – 3 – ProficiencyPrecise use of professional language that is mostly free of bias, and supported with evidence (in-text citations and references in APA style with occasional errors). Established a concisely stated scholarly position appropriate for purpose, format, style, and audience with minimal errors that do not distract the reader.0C – 2 – CompetenceAdequate use of professional language supported with evidence (in-text citations and references in APA style with numerous errors). Established a concisely stated scholarly position appropriate for purpose, format, style, and audience with errors that distract the reader.0F – 1 – No PassDoes not utilize professional language, does not support with evidence in APA style, and does not establish a scholarly position that is appropriate for purpose, format, style, and audience or contains numerous errors that diminish readability.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted

WRITE MY PAPER

Comments

Leave a Reply