Evaluation Results
The evaluation results section describes
what was learned from the evaluation. While
only two items are listed in this checklist, the
results section will likely be the longest part
of the report, because it includes the most
important and substantive information.
Organize results by evaluation questions or
criteria, rather than data collection methods
or sources, to make explicit connections
between evaluation questions, conclusions,
and findings. For example, restate each
evaluation question as a heading, and then
present findings and conclusions in
subsections of each question.
Findings: Present the analyzed data and
other evidence used to formulate the
conclusions. Provide relevant information
about the representativeness of the data,
such as response rates or data source
characteristics.
Conclusions: Conclusions are answers to
the evaluation questions. Start each
conclusion subsection with a statement that
directly answers the evaluation question. To
enhance transparency, remind the reader of
the relevant findings and interpretation
procedures used to reach conclusions.
Recommendations
The recommendations section includes
suggestions for actions that align with
intended evaluation uses. If there are
several, group them in categories, such as
evaluation question, program component,
or timing.
Development process: Explain how the
recommendations were generated.
Recommendations for the program:
Identify suggested actions for stakeholders
to consider. Refer to the specific evaluation
results to support each recommendation.
Provide supporting informationsuch as
priorities, timing, and potential costs and
benefitsto facilitate action planning.
Recommendations for future evaluations:
List recommendations for future
evaluations of the program, if any. Provide a
rationale for each suggestion. This section
should be clearly labeled and distinct from
evidence-based recommendations about
the program.
Ideas for consideration: Under certain
circumstances, it may be appropriate to
include suggestions based on the
evaluators experience, rather than direct
evidence. This section should be clearly
labeled and distinct from evidence-based
recommendations about the program.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.