quick self evaluation

3 course sources must be integrated throughout the entire submission with in-text citations, sources should be connected to ethnographic data collected (interview and participant observation). should use at least 3-4 themes to organize discussion of readings.

A = Excellent

A- = very good but could be improved

includes reference to 3 sources but may not be fully integrated into final product. uses these sources to analyze data collected but this could have been done with more thoroughness or consistency. At least three themes are focused on.

B= good work but much could be improved

reference to 2-3 sources but not fully integrated into final product. may not use these sources to analyze data collected through interview and participant observation. At least 2-3 themes are used but information could be better organized around these themes.

C= barely meets minimum requirements

uses only 1-2 sources. sources ARE NOT fully integrated and may be referred to only vaguely or very briefly. Not able to effectively connect the course sources with data collected. Only 1-2 themes are mentioned and the analysis of the reading could be better connected with these themes.

F= Below expectations

may not refer to any readings/ films at all or only very generally. only briefly touched on 1 theme.

Total out of

20 points

(1) how they can relate or their own experiences with that particular set of themes, (2) have them answer at least one of the questions you asked in your interview assignment, (3) what they think you should add to your project, or something that you have overlooked, or should think about more.

A = Excellent

very thorough proof of outreach that demonstrates completion of these three items: how they can relate, answering at least one of the questions from interview and any suggestions they have. outreach to at least 5 people.

A- = very good but could be improved

outreach to 4-5 people, may be missing one of the items from the prompts, or responses could be elaborated upon

B= good work but much could be improved

outreach to 3-4 people, may only respond to one of the prompts, responses may be very short

C= barely meets minimum requirements

outreach to only 2-3 people, may only respond to one of the prompts

F= Below expectations

outreach to 0-1 person, minimal evidence of outreach

Which aspects of your project did participants most connect with? What would you improve if you were doing the project again? How did what you heard from your outreach relate to themes from the 3 course readings? (500 words or more)

A = Excellent

Reflection on outreach that is at least 500 words and connects to at least three readings/films. Answers all of the questions as described in the prompt.

A- = very good but could be improved

400-500 words, connects to only 2-3 of the course readings/films, may only answer 2/3 of the questions in the prompt

B= good work but much could be improved

300-400 words; only answers 1/3 of the questions in the prompt, only connects to 1 course reading/film, or reflection needs elaboration

C= barely meets minimum requirements

200-300 words; does not follow the prompt; very brief reflection; does not reference any course readings/films

F= Below expectations

100-200 words

3 course sources – all with correct citation; student cites three course readings or films throughout their outreach/reflection using in-text citation and completes a full bibliography without any errors

A = Excellent

A- = very good but could be improved

3 sources but may be few errors with citations (minor), may not have consistent in-text citation for all three sources

B= good work but much could be improved

2-3 sources, some errors with citations both in-text and in the bibliography

C= barely meets minimum requirements

only 1-2 sources included in the bibliography. many errors with citation. may not have any in-text citations.

F= Below expectations

no bibliography or only 1 source cited. no in-text citations. bibliography is full of errors.