sociology writing – family background and social mobility

I will give you the 10 step/presentation I did to do this paper that you can work on in the final paper (( I used wrong number data so I will give you pdf say Nora pdf that have the right number and correct data GSS to use in the final paper))

“no chagpt no claud no AI any kind I will check and if I find I will let you rewrite it so please don’t use it.”

this is what you are going to work on for the final paper

Mechanics, Originality, and Voice (10% of Final Paper)

Instead of splitting points across just formatting, grammar, and citations, we are rewarding strong student authorship and effort. Here’s the updated breakdown:

Component	Points (of Final Paper)
Original Voice & Specificity	7%
Citation Use (in-text, no block quotes)	2%
Formatting & Grammar	1%

What This Means:

• Original Voice & Specificity (7%): I want to hear your voice in this paper. Be precise and thoughtful in how you interpret results, frame your ideas, and explain their significance. Go beyond generic phrasingwrite in a way that makes clear this is your work.
• Citation Use (2%): Cite your sources properly within the text. Dont use long block quotes. Paraphrase and integrate the literature in your own words.
• Formatting & Grammar (1%): Follow standard guidelines for formatting and aim for claritybut dont stress over perfection here.

---

Paper Format & Content

Follow the detailed component-by-component instructions below to meet expectations for each section. All required elements are marked in bold and must be included to receive full credit.

Cover Sheet and Abstract
Cover sheet needs to include:

• Paper Title
• Your Name
• Course Name: Sociology 400w: Senior Seminar
• Date of Submission

Abstract

• Sentence introducing your research project/motive.
• Sentence describing the methods.
• Sentence or two describing the data and sample.
• Summary sentences for each of your major findings.
• Key Words: List at least 4 key words.

---

Introduction

• 35 sentences introducing your topic.
• Move from general to specific.
• Cite findings from the literature.
• A sentence or two stating your motive.
• A statement of the purpose of your specific research question/topic.
• A description of your data and sample.
• A description of your method.

---

Literature Review

• Introduction to Literature Paragraph
  • Sentence describing the purpose of your study
  • Sentence or two introducing and describing your DVs
  • Sentence introducing your IVs
• Paragraphs for each of ten research articles
  • Write a sentence or two to introduce the authors and the primary purpose of the research.
  • A sentence or two about their methods.
  • A sentence or two about the findings of that study as it relates to the section topic.

You will also receive points for the organization of the literature review. To earn full points on organization, you must demonstrate logical sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs with transitions to enhance organization. This includes:

• Dividing the review into sections with headings
• Overview paragraphs for each section in which you synthesize the articles that follow

---

Hypotheses (these may conclude your Lit Review, or be a separate sections)

• A transition beween the lit review and hypotheses
• Clear statements of all hypotheses.

---

Methods

• Description of Sample and Data
  • Introduction to Data Set
  • Description of Questionnaire
  • Description of Sample and Sampling Method
  • Description of Subset and/or Sample Characteristics
• Describe the Measures
  • Paragraph for each IV and DV used in analyses
  • What was the variable concept that you were trying to measure?
  • How was the variable operationalized? (Survey item and/or, response choices and/or, scale creation)
  • If you include control variables, tell us what they are and how they are measured.
• Analyses Paragraph (from the Methods section)

---

Results/Findings and Tables

• Descriptive Statistics
  • One sentence describing each variable with univariate statistics
  • You may (but are not required to) include a table.
• Analytical Results
  • You must have a paragraph for each bivariate test.
  • For chi-square tests:
    • In a sentence or two, describe the relationship between the variableswrite about the column percentages here.
    • Write a sentence explaining the results of the chi-square test (with the chi-square statistic, degrees of freedom, and p-value in parentheses).
    • Make a statement about whether or not the results of the test support your hypotheses.
• Tables: Properly formatted table for each bivariate or multivariate test.

---

Discussion and Conclusion

• Overview Paragraph
  • Provide a 23 sentence introduction to your topic including a sentence explaining the motive of your study
  • Write a sentence explaining your data
  • Write a sentence explaining your method
  • Give (in a few sentences) an overall statement of the findings of your study
• Revisit each bivariate or multivariate test in one paragraph. Each paragraph must include:
  • Introduce the hypothesis
  • In a sentence or two, state how your findings either support or refute this hypothesis
  • In 13 sentences, revisit the literature
  • Provide a summary sentence generalization or interpretation of your findings related to that hypothesis
• Limitations Paragraph
  • In 35 sentences, identify any issues that might affect your ability to generalize your research
  • Write a sentence or two describing how you could improve on this research to make the findings more generalizable
• Directions for Future Research Paragraph/Policy Implications
  • Make two or three suggestions for future research. Write a sentence or two describing each and explaining how it furthers your research.
  • OR make two or three suggestions for policy implications. Write a sentence or two describing each and explaining how your research supports that implication.
• Conclusion
  • In a sentence, indicate the motive of your study
  • In a sentence, describe your data and methods
  • In 35 sentences, summarize your findings
  • Make a final, general statement about how your research makes a contribution to the literature, provides important policy implications, or suggests further research

---

References

• Properly formatted references for at least 10 peer-reviewed journal articles.
• References section should start at the top of its own page.

---

Mechanics

• Formatting and Fonts
  • Margins: Use standard margins
  • Spacing: Double-space
    • Exceptions: Blocked quotes, notes, captions, long headingsthese should be single-spaced with double-space between items
  • It is standard to left-align your text, but I have a soft spot for justified text, so, if you prefer, you may Justify the text.
  • Fonts: Use a standard font in size 11 or 12.
  • Pagination: Number all pages beginning with the introduction.
    • Page numbers should appear at the bottom (L, C, or R) of the page.
  • Headings:
    • Can be made bold, italics, underlined, all caps, small caps, or centered (or any combination) and up to two font sizes larger than manuscript text font.
    • Should continue following double-space from the previous text (do not put on another page unless it is to avoid a hanging headingi.e., a heading without text immediately following it).

---

Length Requirement

• There is no explicit length requirement for your paper, but you should aim for around 1525 pages.
  • This does not include tables and references.
  • Papers shorter than the above recommendations are likely insufficient in meeting the content requirements, but papers exceeding the recommendations by more than 5 pages likely include too much information.

Rubric

Final Paper

Final Paper

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCover Sheet & Abstract	5 ptsFull MarksAll required elements present; abstract summarizes motive, data, methods, findings, and keywords clearly.2.5 ptsDevelopingMissing or vague summary; lacks key components (e.g., keywords or motive). 0 ptsNo Marks	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction	5 ptsFull MarksStrong hook; clear motive, research question, and method; relevant citations used effectively.2.5 ptsDevelopingIntroduction lacks clarity, specificity, or is too vague; missing key elements. 0 ptsNo Marks	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review	20 ptsFull MarksArticles clearly grouped by theme; each summary is accurate and relevant; strong synthesis in section overviews; transitions enhance organization.10 ptsDevelopingArticles listed without synthesis; poor organization; summaries are too vague or descriptive without connection to research topic. 0 ptsNo Marks	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHypotheses	5 ptsFull MarksClearly stated hypotheses that follow logically from literature; effective transition from lit review.2.5 ptsDevelopingHypotheses unclear, missing, or disconnected from the literature. 0 ptsNo Marks	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethods	10 ptsFull MarksDetailed description of dataset, sample, and variables; demonstrates understanding of measurement and analysis strategy.5 ptsDevelopingIncomplete or unclear explanation of sample, measures, or method; lacks specificity. 0 ptsNo Marks	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFindings and Tables	25 ptsFull MarksEach variable is described with appropriate statistics; each analysis is interpreted clearly with relevant test statistics and direct reference to the hypothesis; tables are student-generated, formatted according to assignment instructions (labels, titles, notes, etc.), and placed in the correct location within the paper.12.5 ptsDevelopingMost variables are described with appropriate statistics, though one or more may be incomplete or inaccurate; interpretations reference test statistics or hypotheses but may be vague or uneven; tables are present but may be missing required elements of formatting (labels, titles, notes, etc.) or placed incorrectly in the paper. 0 ptsNo Marks	25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion and Conclusion	15 ptsFull MarksOverview, hypothesis-by-hypothesis discussion, limitations, and future research/policy suggestions are clearly presented and insightful; writing is cohesive.8 ptsDevelopingMissing sections; vague generalizations; minimal insight or reflection on findings. 0 ptsNo Marks	15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences	5 ptsFull MarksAt least 10 peer-reviewed sources; properly formatted; matches in-text citations.2.5 ptsDevelopingFewer than 10 sources; inconsistent formatting; mismatches between in-text and reference list. 0 ptsNo Marks	5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginal Voice & Specificity	7 ptsFull MarksWriting reflects a clear personal voice and authorial presence; interpretations are thoughtful and grounded in evidence; avoids generic or ChatGPT-style phrasing.3.5 ptsDevelopingVoice feels generic, vague, or overly reliant on stock phrases; lacks ownership or specificity. 0 ptsNo Marks	7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitation Use (In-Text)	2 ptsFull MarksCitations are integrated smoothly; sources are paraphrased effectively; no block quotes.1 ptsDevelopingMissing citations, excessive quoting, or weak paraphrasing; improper integration. 0 ptsNo Marks	2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and Grammar	1 ptsFull MarksProfessional and readable formatting; mostly free of grammar or spelling issues.0.5 ptsDevelopingRepeated formatting or grammar issues interfere with clarity. 0 ptsNo Marks	1 pts

Total Points: 100

WRITE MY PAPER