Purpose
This assignment explores how leadership styles and models relate to ethics and align with Coveys Principle-Centered Leadership (PCL) framework.
You will also reflect on how these ideas shape your own leadership approach.
Step 1: Access the NSU Library
To complete this assignment, you must use scholarly sources from the NSU Online Library.
How to Access:
- Go to: to an external site.
- Click on Databases or Search the Library.
- Log in using your NSU SharkLink credentials
- Choose a database such as:
- ProQuest
- EBSCOhost
- Google Scholar (via NSU)
Step 2: Search for Leadership Sources
Use search terms such as:
- leadership styles in organizations.
- transformational leadership theory.
- servant leadership model.
- ethical leadership framework.
Tip: Select peer-reviewed to find scholarly journal articles.
Step 3: Select Your Focus
From your research, select:
- One leadership style (e.g., transformational, servant, authentic)
- One leadership model or framework
Assignment Requirements
Write a 5-page paper (including cover page and references) that addresses the following:
1. Leadership Style & Model
- Describe your selected leadership style
- Describe your selected leadership model
- Use scholarly sources to support your explanation
2. Connection to Covey
- How do your selected style and model align with Coveys Principle-Centered Leadership characteristics?
- Identify and explain key similarities
3. Ethics in Leadership
- What role does ethics play in leadership?
- How does ethics influence leadership effectiveness?
- How is ethics reflected in your selected style/model?
4. Your Leadership Perspective
- How do you view the importance of ethics in leadership?
- How do you envision your own leadership style?
- Which elements of your selected style/model do you connect with most?
Organization
Your paper should include:
- Introduction
- Leadership Style & Model
- Connection to Covey
- Ethics in Leadership
- Personal Leadership Perspective
- Conclusion
- References
Writing Expectations
- Use APA format (7th edition)
- Include at least 3 scholarly sources from the NSU Library
- Write clearly and professionally
- Proofread carefully before submitting
Due Date
Sunday, May 17, 2026 by 11:59 PM (EST)
Academic Integrity
- Review your Turnitin report before submitting
- Similarity scores above 15% should be revised
- All work must reflect your own analysis and voice
Written Assignments (100 pts)
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Points |
|
Relevance 20% |
ExceptionalWritten account of the learning experience is relevant and meaningful to student, to assignment requirements, AND overall course goals.20 to >18 pts Above AverageWritten account of the learning experience is relevant and meaningful to student, assignment requirements, OR overall course goals.18 to >16 pts AverageAttempts to demonstrate relevance (to either the student, assignment, OR overall course goals) but the relevance is unclear to the reader.16 to >13 pts Below AverageParts of the reflection are not made relevant to the student, assignment requirements, and/or overall course learning goals.13 to >0 pts |
/20 pts |
|
Analysis 20% |
ExceptionalMoves beyond simple description to an analysis of how the experience contributed to students understanding of self, others, AND course concepts.20 to >18 pts Above AverageThe reflection demonstrates student attempts to analyze by addressing understanding of self, others, OR course concepts.18 to >16 pts AverageAttempts applying the learning to understanding of self, others, and/or course concepts but relies primarily on description of concept.16 to >13 pts Below AverageReflection does not move beyond description of the learning prompt(s).13 to >0 pts |
/20 pts |
|
Synthesis 25% |
ExceptionalThe reflection demonstrates connections between the experience and material from other courses; past experience; AND/OR personal goals.25 to >23 pts Above AverageDemonstrates connections between the experience and material from other courses; past experience; or personal goals.23 to >21 pts AverageLittle to no attempt to demonstrate connections between the learning experience and previous other personal OR learning experiences.21 to >17 pts Below AverageNo attempt to demonstrate connections to previous learning or experience.17 to >0 pts |
/25 pts |
|
Self Reflection 25% |
ExceptionalDemonstrates ability to question biases, stereotypes, assumptions, preconceptions, AND defines new modes of thinking as a result.25 to >23 pts Above AverageDemonstrates ability to question biases, stereotypes, and preconceptions.23 to >21 pts AverageSome attempt at growth mindset thought patterns, but fails to demonstrate awareness of personal biases, etc.21 to >17 pts Below AverageNo attempt at growth mindset thought patterns.17 to >0 pts |
/25 pts |
|
Clarity 10% |
ExceptionalLanguage is clear and expressive. Abstract concepts are explained accurately. Explanation of concepts could make sense to an uninformed reader.10 to >9 pts Above AverageMinor, infrequent lapses in clarity and accuracy. Grammatical or mechanical errors that largely do not interfere with meaning.9 to >8 pts AverageThere are frequent lapses in clarity and accuracy. Grammatical or mechanical errors may interfere with meaning.8 to >6 pts Below AverageGrammatical or mechanical errors result in confusion for reader. Concepts are either omitted or are presented inaccurately.6 to >0 pts |
/10 pts |
Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.
NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.