managing FNP patients

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

25 to >13.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationsFully addresses all elements of the assignment and provides detail and quality examples. It is clear that the student fully understands the key issues.13 to >7.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses most elements of the assignment. Few details or examples support the paper. It is clear that the student has a general understanding of the issues.

7 to >0.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsAddresses a few elements of the assignment; many are not addressed. Details and examples are missing. It is clear that the student does not understand many aspects of the key issues.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsMost elements of the assignment are not addressed. There are no details or examples provided. It is clear that the student does not understand the key issues.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication

20 to >10.4 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAssignment shows strong, insightful evidence of the synthesis and application of the ideas and concepts.10.4 to >5.6 ptsMeets ExpectationsAssignment shows some evidence of the synthesis and application of the ideas and concepts.

5.6 to >0.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe assignment shows little evidence of the synthesis and application of the ideas and concepts.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe assignment shows no evidence of the synthesis and application of the ideas and concepts.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking

20 to >10.4 ptsExceeds ExpectationsDemonstrates original thought and critical thinking skills. Presents a clear, focused central argument and supports it effectively with concrete details, examples, and sound logic. Ideas are skillfully paraphrased, and direct quotations are minimal and well-chosen.10.4 to >5.6 ptsMeets ExpectationsPresents and supports a clear and focused central argument, but ideas may not be consistently convincing. Supporting details are relevant and logical but may lack depth. Ideas are effectively paraphrased, and direct quotations are minimal.

5.6 to >0.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPresents a central argument but may be overly general/broad. Supporting points may be vague, too obvious, or otherwise unconvincing. May struggle to express ideas or lack interesting details.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsCentral argument is unclear or missing. Lacks focus. Supporting details are insufficient, not relevant, and/or not based on sound logic. Attempts to paraphrase do not reflect understanding.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Aid

10 to >5.2 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe visual aid submitted represents a thorough understanding of the course content discussed in the video response.5.2 to >2.8 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe visual aid submitted represents a strong understanding of the course content discussed in the video response.

2.8 to >0.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe visual aid submitted represents some understanding of the course content discussed in the video response.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsEither the visual aid is not submitted or it does not represent an understanding of the course content discussed in the video response.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVideo Delivery

10 to >5.2 ptsExceeds ExpectationsDemonstrates careful and complete planning, preparation, and practiced execution. Speaker maintains good eye contact with the camera and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around). Speaker does not rely on notes nor slides Uses academic tone and language.5.2 to >2.8 ptsMeets ExpectationsDemonstrates some planning, preparation, and practiced execution. Speaker generally maintains good eye contact with the camera and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around) with only a few lapses. Speaker sometimes relies on reading notes and/or slides. Mostly uses academic tone and language.

2.8 to >0.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsDemonstrates little planning, preparation, and practiced execution. Speaker indicates little preparation through lack of eye contact and body language. Speaker reads mostly from notes and/or is not prepared. Some attempt at using academic tone and language.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDemonstrates no planning, preparation, or practiced execution. Speaker indicates no preparation through lack of eye contact and body language. Speaker reads exclusively from notes and/or slides and is not prepared; delivery is distracting and takes away from the content. Little to no attempt at using academic tone and language.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources, citations, and references

5 to >2.6 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe required number of relevant audience-appropriate sources have been expertly cited and integrated into the content to support ideas.2.6 to >1.4 ptsMeets ExpectationsMost sources are cited and referenced correctly. Meets most of required sources for the assignment.

1.4 to >0.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsDoes not meet the required sources for the assignment. Sources are cited and referenced incorrectly or missing.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not meet the required sources for the assignment. Sources are cited and referenced incorrectly or missing.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneral Writing Mechanics

5 to >2.6 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe writing demonstrates sophisticated clarity and conciseness and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct with minimal to no errors.2.6 to >1.4 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe writing is clear, concise, and well organized. May contain a few punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.

1.4 to >0.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe writing lacks clarity, conciseness, or organization. Several errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe writing is unfocused and poorly organized. Many errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style

5 to >2.6 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe assignment accurately and consistently follows APA Style. Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.2.6 to >1.4 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe assignment consistently follows current APA Style with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes. Mostly meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

1.4 to >0.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsThe assignment has numerous errors in APA Style. Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style. May not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe assignment has significant errors in APA Style. Does not meet length and formatting requirements of the assignment.

5 pts